How we vote now
How we could vote
Today, millions cast a ballot that elects no one; voting differently would let far more voters help elect someone who shares their views.
Since only one person can win in each riding with our current voting system, many voters fear “splitting the vote” and so don’t vote for their sincere preference. Other systems don’t penalize you for voting honestly. “Strategic voting under STV is qualitatively more difficult than under other commonly-used voting schemes.” Bartholdi & Orlin, “Single transferable vote resists strategic voting” (1991)
Source: Ipsos (2021).
What actually happened
What could happen
The gap between the two lines is how far the seat count sits from matching the vote: the closer they are, the more closely seats track votes.
Quebec, 2022. Each dot is a seat; the coloured wedge behind each party is its share of the vote. Under today’s system, a party’s dots can spill far past its arc (more seats than votes) while other parties are nearly shut out. Voting differently could make votes and seats match more closely.
Quebec 2022 · small-party voters whose ballot elected no one
How we vote now
Proportion of voters who elected an MNA, by party
How we could vote
Proportion of voters who elected an MNA, by party
The way we vote now, voters with minority political views are often ignored. In Quebec’s 2022 election most Québec solidaire, Parti Québécois, and Conservative voters cast a ballot that elected no one, while the largest party turned 41% of the vote into 72% of the seats. A different way of voting could ensure that far more of these voters could help elect someone who shares their views, and smaller parties could win the seats their voters wanted them to have.
How Calgary voted
The MPs it elected
If seats matched votes
Nearly 40% of Calgary voted for the Liberals, the party that formed government, yet elected only one Liberal MP of eleven. No wonder Alberta feels ignored by the federal government. A different system could have given Calgary about four government MPs.
Australia · share of women elected, by year
In Australia, the Senate is elected from multi-member districts and the House of Representatives from single-member seats. Multi-member voting has elected more women than single-member voting in every election for nearly 50 years, and never once fewer.
The root of the problem is that, in Canada, most votes simply don’t matter. In BC’s 2024 election, barely half the voters helped elect an MLA. And when the system ignores half the votes, the politicians ignore the voters who cast them – that’s a problem for all of us.
Imagine instead if we all had strong and equal voices in our legislatures — how much richer, more robust and responsive could our democracy be?
The good news is that there are lots of examples of how we can vote better — virtually every EU country already uses a more fair and inclusive approach. All we have to do is pick one that suits our culture and geography and tailor it for use here in BC.
Our biggest obstacle is that those with power to fix the problem aren’t motivated to — after all, they won under our current system, and if we vote differently, they might need to share power in ways they haven’t had to before, or perhaps even risk not getting re-elected, which they’re reluctant to do.
Read on to learn more about why we should change how we vote, what the best options for better voting are, and how you can help bring that change about.
In BC’s 2025 Electoral Reform process, we advocated for a new “Regional Representation” model.