Help Take First-Past-the-Post to Court! FVBC Fundraiser Now Underway – Internet & Live Townhall Meetings on Feb 5th

The Quebec Court Challenge

Canadian Supreme Court, where this case may be heading.
  • Click here or button to right to register for the online presentation (webinar) (not necessary now, but appreciated as it helps us estimate how many people to expect, particularly for in-person events)
  • Click here for instructions on joining webinar (we suggest you check in 10-15 minutes in advance)

A court challenge aimed at invalidating the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) electoral system is now before the Quebec Appeals Court. It was launched in 2004 in response to the repeated failures of civic actions through political means. The case focuses on the two main components of the right to vote as defined by the Supreme Court: meaningful participation and significant representation. Both are systematically violated by the current FPTP voting system. The case will be heard in the Quebec appeals court on February 8, 2011 and could be before the Canadian Supreme Court before 2012. The plaintiffs are seeking financial support for legal fees.

Continue reading

2007 Federal Public Consultations on Democratic Reform

In 2007, the Canadian federal government undertook a public consultation on democratic reform.  This consultation addressed five main areas:  the role of the citizen in democracy, the House of Commons, the Senate, political parties and the electoral system.

The consultation process the government used was critiqued from across the political spectrum.  For example, see critiques by Democracy Watch, NDP Democratic Reform Critic Catherine Bell, and the Globe and Mail’s columnist John Ibbitson (cited by blogger IdealisticPragmatist)  The consultation was also described without significant comment in the 2009 text, Canadian Politics, by James Bickerton.

The consultation summary, along with the full report, appendices and participant guide, is available on the Government of Canada’s Democratic Reform website.  One brief excerpt from the summary follows:

“Most forum participants believed that governments do not consult people regularly and felt that consultation was often not genuine. As remedies for encouraging public engagement in the democratic process, forum participants tended to recommend better, more respectful consultation and stronger civics education to give young people a greater appreciation of our system. A desire for stronger civics education emerged spontaneously in discussions of all topics.  The survey data revealed exceptionally high levels of interest in more government consultation.”

Click on the links below for selected documents:

2003 Book – Fixing Canadian Democracy

This book was written by Gordon Gibson (who later played an important role in BC’s Citizens’ Assembly) and put out by the Fraser Institute.  It argues that “multiple significant reforms are available to restore voter confidence in our public institutions.”

Excerpt from summary:

Fixing Canadian Democracy points to a variety of ways to improve our governance system. The book is the result of a major Fraser Institute conference on democratic reform during which some of the finest practitioners and thinkers from British Columbia and Ottawa were brought together for presentations on selecting and empowering representatives, the place and limits of direct democracy, constitutional constraints, and how to make any of the above a reality.

Some versions of democracy work better than others. Gordon Gibson, the book’s editor and a contributing author, points out that Canada’s democratic system is one of the most primitive in the western world and that Canadians are — for all practical purposes — governed by four-year elected dictators as things stand now.

“We ought to be the most prosperous and harmonious country on the face of the earth, yet clearly we are not,” says Gibson, senior fellow in Canadian Studies at the Institute. “Our living standard is much lower than in the US or many other smaller countries and the public is broadly cynical and apathetic with respect to our political process – and rightly so.“”